Galaxy A37 vs Galaxy A36 expected differences:
| Galaxy A37* | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|
| Slightly thinner and lighter design | 7.4 mm, 195 g |
| Same bright 6.7-inch 120 Hz AMOLED, but with an improved optical fingerprint scanner | Same display, slower in-display optical fingerprint scanner |
| New Exynos 1580 / 1480 chip; expected faster UI and better stability | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 with micro-stutters and slow app loading |
| Same camera hardware but potential software improvements | Same triple camera; oversharpening, warm tones, weak video dynamic range |
| 5,000 mAh battery | 5,000 mAh battery |
| 45W — possible faster first-30-minutes charge (around 60%) | 45W; 55% in 30 minutes |
| Android 16 + One UI 8, same long software support or better | Android 15 + One UI 7, 6-year support |
*rumored/expected
Table of Contents:
Design and Size
Same design, but thinner
The Galaxy A36 took a noticeable step forward in build quality. It was the first of the series to adopt Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both sides, which is a big deal for a phone that starts at $399.
Unlike the Galaxy A5x series, however, the A36 still rocked a plastic frame instead of an aluminum one. Still, overall, its shape was slimmer, cleaner, and it weighed less than its predecessor. The Key Island (a protruding part where the volume and power keys are) remained part of the A-series identity, and while the color options were not the most exciting, the overall hardware felt a touch more premium than the A35.
| Galaxy A37* | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|
| Thickness ~7.1 mm |
Thickness 7.4 mm |
| Dimensions 152.8 x 72 |
Dimensions 162.9 x 78.2 |
| Weight 195 grams or lighter |
Weight 195 grams |
*rumored/expected
Display Differences
The Galaxy A36 introduced a significant improvement when it came to display brightness. While Samsung advertised 1200 nits, our lab measurements showed that the A36 can peak at over 1700 nits at 20 percent APL, making it one of the brightest screens in its class.
The Galaxy A37 is expected to feature the same 6.7-inch FHD+ 120 Hz Super AMOLED display. Samsung rarely changes A-series displays year over year unless it introduces a larger redesign, so we don’t expect any upgrades this year.
| Galaxy A37* | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|
| Size 6.7″ |
Size 6.7″ |
| Brightness 1700 nits (peak) |
Brightness 1700 nits (peak) |
*rumored/expected
Some good news, however, is that the fingerprint sensor is expected to improve this time. The A36 uses an optical in-display scanner that works fine, but is far from being fast. The A37 is rumored to get an improved optical fingerprint sensor with better speed and reliability, which would help the A37 feel snappier.
Performance and Software
Going back to the roots
| Galaxy A37* | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|
| Chip Exynos 1580 or 1480 |
Chip Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Process 5nm |
Process 5nm |
| RAM, Storage 8/128 GB 8/256 GB LPDDR5 RAM |
RAM, Storage 8/128 GB 8/256 GB LPDDR5 RAM |
*rumored/expected
Camera
No telephoto camera on the horizon
The Galaxy A36 did not bring any camera hardware upgrades over the A35. It used the same 50 MP main, 8 MP ultrawide, and 5 MP macro setup, and the results reflected that.
In our testing, the A36 often produced oversharpened photos and warmer color temperatures than in reality. The video performance lagged behind both the Pixel 8a and even the Galaxy A35 when it came to dynamic range. The only improvement was a slightly different 12 MP selfie camera, but the results were not noticeably better.
| Galaxy A37* | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|
| Main 50 MP, f/1.8 1/1.96″ sensor size |
Main 50 MP, f/1.8 1/1.56″ |
| Ultrawide 8 MP, f/2.2 13 mm 1/4.0″ sensor size |
Ultrawide 8 MP, f/2.2 13 mm 1/4.0″ sensor size |
| Macro 5 MP |
Macro 5 MP |
*rumored/expected
But here’s what we want Samsung to fix:
- Less oversharpening and more natural texture
- More accurate white balance, avoiding the warm shift seen on the A36
- Better dynamic range during video recording
- Ultrawide consistency, which remains a weak point across the A-series
There have been no leaks yet about upgraded sensors or a new ISP on the A37, so improvements are unlikely at this point.
Battery Life and Charging
Only small differences
Battery life may improve indirectly if Samsung uses a more efficient Exynos chip, but it wouldn’t be by much. The A36 did not top the charts in our Battery Score, so there is room for meaningful improvement here.
As for charging, the A36 finally introduced 45 W charging, which the A37 is expected to support as well. In our tests, we charged the A36 fully in 1 hour and 15 minutes, which is also what we expect from the upcoming model.
| Galaxy A37* | Galaxy A36 |
|---|---|
| Battery size 5,000 mAh |
Battery size 5,000 mAh |
|
Charging speeds No wireless charging USB-C 2.0 |
Charging speeds 45W wired |
*rumored/expected
However, there is still no indication of wireless charging, and given Samsung’s mid-range strategy, we do not expect that to change.
Specs Comparison
![]()
|
![]()
|
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
| Dimensions | |
|---|---|
| 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm (~8.7 mm with camera bump) | |
| Weight | |
| 195.0 g | |
| Size | |
|---|---|
| 6.7-inch | 6.7-inch |
| Type | |
| Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz |
| System chip | |
|---|---|
| Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) | |
| Memory | |
| 128GB (UFS 2.2) 8GB/128GB 8GB/256GB 12GB/256GB |
6GB (LPDDR4)/128GB (UFS 2.2) 8GB/128GB 8GB/256GB 12GB/256GB |
| Type | |
|---|---|
| 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charge speed | |
| Wired: 45.0W | Wired: 45.0W |
| Main camera | |
|---|---|
| 50 MP (OIS, PDAF) Aperture size: F1.8 Sensor size: 1/1.96″ |
50 MP (OIS, PDAF) Aperture size: F1.8 Sensor size: 1/1.96″ |
| Second camera | |
| 8 MP (Ultra-wide) Aperture size: F2.2 Sensor size: 1/4″ Pixel size: 1.12 μm |
8 MP (Ultra-wide) Aperture size: F2.2 Sensor size: 1/4″ Pixel size: 1.12 μm |
| Third camera | |
| 5 MP (Macro) Aperture size: F2.4 |
5 MP (Macro) Aperture size: F2.4 |
| Front | |
| 12 MP | 12 MP |
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G specs comparison
or compare them to other phones using our
Phone Comparison tool
Summary
But there is still no confirmation of upgrades in the areas where the A36 needs improvement most. Camera hardware is likely to remain unchanged, you still don’t get even slow wireless charging at this price point, and there is no sign of major battery life improvements.



