The good old days


The MacBook wasn’t always as capable as it is today. | Image by AppleMan
Well, ‘good’ might be a stretch, but Apple products weren’t always as capable as they are today. It’s a perception that is still stuck in the minds of a large subset of customers, who believe that Apple has never had an original thought and its products are flimsy and underpowered.
The iPhone, for example, used to feature tiny batteries and very low amounts of RAM. MacBooks, on the other hand, were incredibly underpowered, though often quite pretty to look at.
Apple justified it back then too
Some of you might remember that Apple used to justify the lower amounts of RAM and computing power across its products. The company used to claim that, due to the hardware and software synergy in its devices, they performed on par with competitors that had better specs on paper.To an extent, that was true. But until the MacBook kept using Intel chips, it really wasn’t a great line of laptops. The iPhone, though a much better purchase than Apple’s laptops back then, also always fell behind its Android peers.
That has all changed


Forget the Pro models, even the base iPhone 17 is fantastic. | Image by PhoneArena
Apple products have not been the same for a long time. The introduction of the M-series chips completely changed the MacBook, making it one of the best laptops money can buy.
Apple’s laptops have improved so much that the recent MacBook Neo, a budget-friendly entry, is seriously threatening the Windows laptop market and selling incredibly well.
The iPhone also caught up a few generations back. Performance, cameras, battery life, RAM, and even the price tags match those found on Samsung and Google phones. Some Chinese flagships still excel, however, but then again they’re in a league of their own.So what’s the deal with Apple Intelligence? Will Apple always be behind?
Siri is going through a rite of passage


Siri has been a very disappointing digital assistant for too many years. | Image by PhoneArena
The entire Apple Intelligence ordeal really reminds me of the old Apple days. I’m left wondering whether Siri will go through the same growth that the iPhone and the MacBook did.
For years, Siri will permanently stay two or three years behind competitors, with Apple often just relying on said competitors. It will become something that everyone just accepts.
The average smartphone user probably won’t care, like they didn’t back when the iPhone didn’t have as much RAM as other flagship phones. For customers who value AI highly, there will be plenty of Android alternatives.
Eventually, there will come a period where AI innovation will stagnate or become too costly for too little a return, and most smartphone manufacturers will start taking it easy. Then, as happened with other specs, Apple products will catch up and there will be equilibrium.
But keeping in mind how the tech industry operates, there would likely be a new technology out by then and Apple might repeat the entire process all over again.

